news analysis advocacy
tips on searching

Search AfricaFocus and 9 Partner Sites

 

 

Visit the AfricaFocus
Country Pages

Algeria
Angola
Benin
Botswana
Burkina Faso
Burundi
Cameroon
Cape Verde
Central Afr. Rep.
Chad
Comoros
Congo (Brazzaville)
Congo (Kinshasa)
Côte d'Ivoire
Djibouti
Egypt
Equatorial Guinea
Eritrea
Ethiopia
Gabon
Gambia
Ghana
Guinea
Guinea-Bissau
Kenya
Lesotho
Liberia
Libya
Madagascar
Malawi
Mali
Mauritania
Mauritius
Morocco
Mozambique
Namibia
Niger
Nigeria
Rwanda
São Tomé
Senegal
Seychelles
Sierra Leone
Somalia
South Africa
South Sudan
Sudan
Swaziland
Tanzania
Togo
Tunisia
Uganda
Western Sahara
Zambia
Zimbabwe

Get AfricaFocus Bulletin by e-mail!

Print this page

Note: This document is from the archive of the Africa Policy E-Journal, published by the Africa Policy Information Center (APIC) from 1995 to 2001 and by Africa Action from 2001 to 2003. APIC was merged into Africa Action in 2001. Please note that many outdated links in this archived document may not work.


APIC: Letter to Members

APIC: Letter to Members
Date distributed (ymd): 001016
APIC Document

This posting contains a letter to APIC members and friends from APIC director Salih Booker.

If you are already an APIC member please consider renewing your financial support for us before the end of the year. If you receive these postings but have not made a financial contribution this year to support our work, please consider doing so. A contribution form for renewal or new membership contributions appears at the end of this posting.

[Special note to subscribers outside the U.S.: As of our last survey, 68% of those who receive these postings are in the U.S., another 4% in Canada, 12% in Africa and 16% elsewhere. Both our mandate and our location mean that many of our postings have a particular focus on decision-making institutions in Washington. In past surveys some of our overseas subscribers say this is one of the features that makes us distinctively useful to them; others say they want less of a U.S. focus. We try to strike a balance and we are always looking for more repostable documents originating directly from Africa.

We are convinced, however, that changing the adverse political climate for Africa here with its multiple effects on the continent is a task that requires all of us. Our experience, whether of the decades-long anti-apartheid campaigns or of the more recent campaigns for a landmine treaty and debt cancellation, convinces us that impact depends on the combined efforts of people working in different places.

Some of you may be able to support us with a financial contribution. Whether or not you can do so personally, please urge your contacts here to do so. Forward this e-mail message to your U.S.-based colleagues who may not be aware of us. And continue to share with us documents and perspectives which can help widen the international debate.]


October 14, 2000

Dear APIC Members and Friends,

Please find (in a separate e-mail message) Questions on Africa Policy for Candidates and Policymakers a joint APIC/Africa Fund publication. It is intended not only for this election campaign period but for afterwards as well. When forced to pay attention to the realities of debt and AIDS, even some of the most unlikely legislators have changed their positions.

There is a pattern, however, in the repeated failure of most policymakers to listen. As this letter is written, Congress is still considering appropriating precisely zero for U.S. obligations towards UN peacekeeping in Africa. Proposals for cuts like these - specifically targeting Africa - reflect the unashamed racism that still permeates U.S. foreign policy. We must be explicit in identifying and attacking this structural racism, which is at the root of the failure to respond to specific issues of concern to Africa.

IMF/World Bank meetings in Prague last month brought new promises of a faster pace for debt relief, with 16 African countries and 4 others scheduled to receive some benefits before the end of the year. An anonymous "senior administration official,." however, admitted to the New York Times (September 17, 2000) that the new steps were largely "window-dressing" designed to placate protesters.

Even those countries qualifying for relief will be left with huge debt payments still outpacing desperately needed expenditures on health, education and other development priorities. To add insult to injury, the U.S. Congress is balking at providing the $435 million the administration has requested to pay the U.S. share for these limited measures.

What is required is outright cancellation of the illegitimate debts of African countries. Debts that went to finance Cold War dictators, apartheid destruction and damaging structural adjustment policies should simply be cancelled.

Demonstrations from Seattle to Prague show that the dogmas of free-market fundamentalism are under challenge as never before. But the failure to develop alternatives that are more than window-dressing is strongly linked to the fact that so many of the victims of global apartheid are people of color whose suffering is accepted as "natural."

The political climate on these and other Africa issues will not change unless public pressure for real change continues to grow. APIC is working closely with the Africa Fund and the American Committee on Africa, as merger plans proceed, to get our common messages out to ever wider constituencies.

Among our activities in the last few months:

  • A joint APIC/Africa Fund press conference on President Clinton's trip to Nigeria received wide coverage, including multiple broadcasts by C-SPAN. Panelists raised questions about the failure of the administration to offer debt cancellation to Nigeria, and its focus on military cooperation while ignoring continued military repression in the Niger Delta.
  • APIC widely distributed (by e-mail, on the web, and to Congressional offices) statements calling for debt cancellation from the Africa Fund's networks of African-American religious leaders and state and local officials.
  • An APIC/Africa Fund op-ed published in The Boston Globe denounced the Export-Import Bank plan to loan $1 billion at commercial rates to African countries for AIDS, and instead called for allocation of five percent of the budget surplus to a global emergency health fund to deal comprehensively with health issues including AIDS.
  • The Advocacy Network for Africa (ADNA), for which APIC serves as co-chair and communications facilitator, has grown to over 210 member groups. Beginning this month, an archive of action alerts, updates and event notices shared among ADNA groups is available to the public in a special section of the APIC web site.
  • APIC's background paper Talking about 'Tribe' which attacks one of the most pervasive and damaging stereotypes about African conflicts is being adapted for publication by Teaching Tolerance, which reaches some 600,000 teachers and millions of students.

Thank you for your partnership.

Sincerely,

Salih Booker
Director

To contribute through our secure web site or to print out a membership form go to: http://www.africapolicy.org/join.htm


This material is produced and distributed by the Africa Policy Information Center (APIC). APIC provides accessible information and analysis in order to promote U.S. and international policies toward Africa that advance economic, political and social justice and the full spectrum of human rights.

URL for this file: http://www.africafocus.org/docs00/mem0010.php