news analysis advocacy
AfricaFocus Bookshop
New Gift CDs
China & Africa
tips on searching

Search AfricaFocus and 9 Partner Sites



Visit the AfricaFocus
Country Pages

Burkina Faso
Cape Verde
Central Afr. Rep.
Congo (Brazzaville)
Congo (Kinshasa)
Côte d'Ivoire
Equatorial Guinea
São Tomé
Sierra Leone
South Africa
South Sudan
Western Sahara

Get AfricaFocus Bulletin by e-mail!         More on politics & human rights | economy & development | peace & security | health

Print this page

USA/Africa: Global Health Commitment

AfricaFocus Bulletin
Dec 18, 2008 (081218)
(Reposted from sources cited below)

Editor's Note

"The U.S. government [should] demonstrate, through policies and actions, that this nation fundamentally believes in the value of better health for all. The committee is calling on the next President to highlight health as a pillar of U.S. foreign policy. .. The U.S. government should act in the global interest, recognizing that long-term diplomatic, economic, and security benefits for the United States will follow." - The U.S. Commitment to Global Health: Recommendations for the New Administration from the Institute of Medicine, National Academy of Sciences

In a report released on December 15, which received little coverage in the U.S. or international press, a committee of the prestigious Institute of Medicine released a study report calling for the U.S. to double its budget for global health and make the commitment a centerpiece of U.S. foreign policy. The committee's work was sponsored by four U.S. government agencies and five private foundations, and the 50-page report is available on-line for download at and

The committee was co-chaired by former Under-Secretary of State Thomas R. Pickering and by Harold E. Varmus, president of the Memorial Sloan-Ketting Cancer Center, and included both American and international experts on public health and related issues.

This AfricaFocus Bulletin contains the executive summary of the report, which expresses an emerging bipartisan consensus that consistent support for global health is both an international obligation and in the national interest..

For previous AfricaFocus Bulletins on health, visit


This issue will be the last issue of AfricaFocus Bulletin for 2008. Regular publication will resume in mid-January, after the holidays. News feeds and other features on will continue to be updated regularly during the break.

Best wishes to our readers for the holidays and the new year.


Holiday Gift Shopping? Take a look at the books or CDs available from Amazon (US, Canada, or UK) at and

And if you are still undecided about what to give, consider gift certificates from (, Amazon Canada (, or Amazon UK (


Many thanks to those of you who have recently sent in a voluntary subscription payment to support AfricaFocus Bulletin. If you haven't yet sent in such a payment and are able to do so, please send in a check or pay on-line with paypal or Google checkout. See for a form to print out or secure links to pay on-line.

++++++++++++++++++++++end editor's note+++++++++++++++++++++++

The U.S. Commitment to Global Health: Recommendations for the New Administration

Institute of Medicine, National Academy of Sciences

Committee on the U.S. Commitment to Global Health, National Research Council .

[The National Academy of Sciences is a private, nonprofit, self-perpetuating society of distinguished scholars engaged in scientific and engineering research, dedicated to the furtherance of science and technology and to their use for the general welfare. Upon the authority of the charter granted to it by the Congress in 1863, the Academy has a mandate that requires it to advise the federal government on scientific and technical matters.

The Institute of Medicine was established in 1970 by the National Academy of Sciences to secure the services of eminent members of appropriate professions in the examination of policy matters pertaining to the health of the public. The Institute acts under the responsibility given to the National Academy of Sciences by its congressional charter to be an adviser to the federal government and, upon its own initiative, to identify issues of medical care, research, and education.]

Executive Summary

At this historic moment, the Obama administration and leaders of the U.S. Congress have the opportunity to advance the welfare and prosperity of people within and beyond the borders of the United States through intensified and sustained attention to better health. The promise of potential solutions in global health has captured the interest of a new generation of philanthropists, students, scientists, private industry leaders, and citizens, eager to make a difference in our interconnected world. Over the last decade, the U.S. government has mirrored the American public's interest with record expenditures on global health. By building on these commitments and deploying the full complement of U.S. assets to achieve global health, the United States can improve the lives of millions around the world, while reflecting America's values and protecting and promoting the nation's interests.

The Institute of Medicine--with the support of four U.S. government agencies and five private foundations--formed an independent committee to examine the United States' commitment to global health and articulate a vision for future U.S. investments and activities in this area. To coincide with the U.S. presidential transition, the committee prepared the following report outlining how the U.S. government can improve global health under the leadership of a new administration. A more complete exploration of this vision--including the role of the commercial sector, foundations, academia, and nongovernmental organizations--will be released in the spring of 2009. Health is a highly valued, visible, and concrete investment that has the power to both save lives and enhance U.S. credibility in the eyes of the world.

In today's market crisis, the financial policies and practices of the most developed nations, including the United States, are seen as the cause of painful economic spillovers in low- and middle-income countries. During economic downturns, population health declines, especially among the poor in low-income countries, who pay a large portion of their health care costs out-of-pocket, without the benefit of social safety nets. It is crucial for the reputation of the United States that the nation live up to its humanitarian responsibilities, despite current pressures on the U.S. economy, and assist lowincome countries in safeguarding the health of their poorest members. The U.S. government can take this opportunity to demonstrate, through policies and actions, that this nation fundamentally believes in the value of better health for all. The committee is calling on the next President to highlight health as a pillar of U.S. foreign policy.

This could be confirmed by a major speech early in his tenure, declaring that the United States has both the responsibility as a global citizen, and an opportunity as a global leader, to contribute to improved health around the world. The U.S. government should act in the global interest, recognizing that long-term diplomatic, economic, and security benefits for the United States will follow.

If health is to hold a more prominent position in U.S. foreign policy, the U.S. government will need to increase coordination among the multiple agencies and departments engaged in global health. A 1997 Institute of Medicine report, America's Vital Interest in Global Health, called for the establishment of a government Interagency Task Force on Global Health, led by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The committee supports this recommendation, but calls for the interagency group to be located more centrally, in the White House. Locating the effort in the White House, potentially within the National Security Council (NSC) and reporting to the President through the NSC Advisor, would give it convening authority among sometimes competing agencies and the ability to make policy recommendations directly to the President.

Within the first year of his administration, the committee recommends that the President create a White House Interagency Committee on Global Health to lead, plan, prioritize, and coordinate the budgeting for major U.S. government global health programs and activities. The Interagency Committee--consisting of heads of major U.S. departments and agencies involved in global health activities--should play the crucial role of ensuring that the U.S. government has a coherent strategy for ongoing investments in global health, and also that health is taken into account when setting U.S. foreign policy in other areas, such as trade, environment, and security.

The committee also calls on the President to designate a senior official at the White House (Executive Office of the President, potentially within the National Security Council) at the level of Deputy Assistant to the President for Global Health to chair the Interagency Committee. The Deputy for Global Health should serve as the primary advisor at the White House on global health, attend National Security Council meetings which deal in any way with global health issues, and work with the National Security Advisor, the Director of Management and Budget, and the President's Science Advisor in carrying out his or her responsibilities.

The committee also asks that by the end of the administration's first term, the President and Congress double annual U.S. commitments to global health between 2008 ($7.5 billion) and 2012 ($15 billion). The committee recommends that the U.S. government commit to $13 billion for the health-related Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) and an additional $2 billion to address the challenges of noncommunicable diseases and injuries.

Meeting the globally recognized MDGs, adopted by the Member States of the United Nations in 2000, would require advanced economies to devote 0.54 percent of their gross national income (GNI) to overseas development assistance. Accordingly, the committee estimates that the U.S. contribution to the health-related MDGs (Goal 4: Reduce child mortality, Goal 5: Improve maternal health, and Goal 6: Combat HIV/AIDS, malaria and other diseases) would be $13 billion per year by 2012.

The allocation of this $13 billion per year should be balanced across the portfolio of global health spending to reflect the breadth of the health-related MDGs. The U.S. government should fulfill its implied commitments under the President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) reauthorization to global AIDS programs ($7.8 billion per year), malaria ($1 billion per year), and tuberculosis ($800 million per year). The remaining $3.4 billion per year would double current levels of spending by the U.S. government for global programs in support of health system strengthening, child and women's health, nutrition, family planning and reproductive health, and neglected diseases of poverty, all of which have been severely underresourced during the past decade.

Additional resources will be required to respond to the contemporary challenges of chronic and noncommunicable diseases and injuries, which are responsible for more than half of the deaths below age 70 in low- and middle-income countries, but are not captured in the health-related MDGs. Cost-effective strategies, such as tobacco control, have the promise of averting millions of premature deaths from noncommunicable diseases in lowand middleincome countries. The committee recommends $2 billion per year to expand the U.S. portfolio in support of these efforts, bringing the overall U.S. government commitment to global health to $15 billion by 2012.

Translating this commitment into sustained, significant, and measurable health outcomes in low- and middle-income countries requires a partnership between the United States and national governments; aid must therefore be allocated in support of technically and financially sound country-led health plans. Even disease- and intervention-specific programs should contribute to stronger health systems and a better trained, more productive health workforce. Congress and the administration should require that aid be accompanied by rigorous countryand program-level evaluations to measure the impact of global health investments in order to maximize their effectiveness. America's traditional strength in the global health field is its capacity to generate knowledge. The committee recommends that Congress continue to fund research in important areas--such as new interventions for the prevention and treatment of infectious diseases--but also allocate a portion of the funding levels recommended in this report to increase funds for three purposes: to study the basic mechanisms of diseases that disproportionately affect poor countries; to identify means to control noncommunicable diseases that are applicable in lowresource settings; and to conduct health systems research to improve the delivery of existing interventions.

While the U.S. government interacts with multiple UN agencies and other intergovernmental bodies, the committee believes that the United States has much to gain from supporting the World Health Organization (WHO) as this body has the unique mandate of setting evidence-based norms on technical and policy matters to improve global health. Many aspects of the WHO's current structure and function, though, hinder its effectiveness. The United States, along with the international community, should support the WHO, but also request a rigorous external review of the organization to develop future-oriented recommendations.

The American public has strongly supported commitments to global health in the past. Repeated polls have shown that health now ranks among Americans' top priorities for development assistance-- not merely to protect U.S. interests, but also as a way of promoting human development worldwide. Working with partners around the world and building on previous commitments, the United States has the responsibility and chance to save and improve the lives of millions; this is an opportunity that the committee hopes the United States will seize.

Committee on t he U.S. Commitment to Global Health

Thomas R. Pickering (Co-Chair), Vice Chairman, Hills & Company, International Consultants, Washington, DC; formerly, Under-Secretary of State for Political Affairs (retired)
Harold E. Varmus (Co-Chair), President and Chief Executive Officer, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York

Nancy Kassebaum Baker, Former U.S. Senator, Burdick, KS
Paulo Buss, President, Funda‡ o Oswaldo Cruz, Rio De Janeiro, Brazil
Haile T. Debas, Executive Director; Chancellor and Dean Emeritus, Global Health Sciences; University of California, San Francisco
Mohamed T. El-Ashry, Senior Fellow, United Nations Foundation, Washington, Dc
Maria Freire, President The Albert and Mary Lasker Foundation, New York
Helene D. Gayle, President and Chief Executive Officer, Care, Atlanta, GA
Margaret A. Hamburg, Senior Scientist, Nuclear Threat Initiative, Washington, DC
J. Bryan Hehir, Parker Gilbert Montgomery Professor of the Practice of Religion and Public Life, Hauser Center for Nonprofit Organizations, Kennedy School, Harvard University, Boston, MA
Prabhat Jha, Canada Research Chair in Health and Development, Centre for Global Health Research, St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Canada
Roderick K. King, IOM Anniversary Fellow; Instructor of Medicine, Department of Global Health and Social Medicine, Harvard Medical School; Senior Faculty, Massachusetts General Hospital Disparities Solutions Center, Boston, MA
Jeffrey P. Koplan, Vice President, Academic Health Affairs, Emory University, Atlanta, GA
Ruth Levine, Vice President for Programs and Operations, Senior Fellow, Center for Global Development, Washington, DC Afaf I. Meleis, Professor of Nursing and Sociology, Margaret Bond Simon Dean of Nursing, School of Nursing, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
Nelson Sewankambo, Dean, Faculty of Medicine, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda
Bennett Shapiro, Chairman, DNDI-North America;partner, Puretech Ventures, New York; Formerly, Executive Vice-president, Merck Research Laboratories (Retired)
Marc Van Ameringen, Executive Director, Global Alliance for Improved Nutrition, Geneva, Switzerland

AfricaFocus Bulletin is an independent electronic publication providing reposted commentary and analysis on African issues, with a particular focus on U.S. and international policies. AfricaFocus Bulletin is edited by William Minter.

AfricaFocus Bulletin can be reached at Please write to this address to subscribe or unsubscribe to the bulletin, or to suggest material for inclusion. For more information about reposted material, please contact directly the original source mentioned. For a full archive and other resources, see

Read more on |Africa Health|

URL for this file: