news analysis advocacy
For more frequent updates, visit the AfricaFocus FaceBook page
tips on searching

Search AfricaFocus and 9 Partner Sites

 

 

Visit the AfricaFocus
Country Pages

Algeria
Angola
Benin
Botswana
Burkina Faso
Burundi
Cameroon
Cape Verde
Central Afr. Rep.
Chad
Comoros
Congo (Brazzaville)
Congo (Kinshasa)
Côte d'Ivoire
Djibouti
Egypt
Equatorial Guinea
Eritrea
Ethiopia
Gabon
Gambia
Ghana
Guinea
Guinea-Bissau
Kenya
Lesotho
Liberia
Libya
Madagascar
Malawi
Mali
Mauritania
Mauritius
Morocco
Mozambique
Namibia
Niger
Nigeria
Rwanda
São Tomé
Senegal
Seychelles
Sierra Leone
Somalia
South Africa
South Sudan
Sudan
Swaziland
Tanzania
Togo
Tunisia
Uganda
Western Sahara
Zambia
Zimbabwe

Get AfricaFocus Bulletin by e-mail! on your Newsreader!

Format for print or mobile

USA/Africa: Wage Penalties for Black Immigrants

AfricaFocus Bulletin
Aug 18, 2011 (110818)
(Reposted from sources cited below)

Editor's Note

"Contrary to the popular impression, black male immigrants are not better off in weekly wages than U.S.-born black males after controlling for observable demographic characteristics [such as level of education and experience]. ... U.S.-born black men earn 19.1% less than similar U.S.-born white men. West Indian men do slightly worse and earn 20.7% less than similar native white men. Haitian men and African men do substantially worse than U.S.-born black men; Haitian men earn 33.8% less, and African men earn 34.7% less than similar native white men." - Economic Policy Institute study

This study from the Economic Policy Institute, released early this year, confirms statistics showing that African immigrants, on average, have higher education levels than U.S.-born blacks or even than U.S.-born non-Hispanic whites. In 2008, for example, 36.6% of Africa-born U.S. residents had a bachelor's degree or higher, as compared to 29.5% of U.S.-born non-Hispanic whites and 16.4% of U.S.- born blacks. Within groups similar in education and other demographic characteristics, however, black immigrants, including African immigrants, are even more disadvantaged in comparison to non-Hispanic whites than U.S.-born blacks.

The study, excerpted here, shows that the picture is more complex than is often assumed. The full study, with tables, charts, and references, is available online at http://www.epi.org / direct URL: http://tinyurl.com/3mfsf82

Another AfricaFocus Bulletin, sent out by e-mail today and available on the web at http://www.africafocus.org/docs11/mig1108a.php, contains excerpts from an extensive new report from the Migration Policy Institute summarizing data about African immigrants in the United States.

For previous AfricaFocus Bulletins on migration issues, see http://www.africafocus.org/migrexp.php

++++++++++++++++++++++end editor's note+++++++++++++++++

The low wages of black immigrants: Wage penalties for U.S.- born and foreign-born black workers

February 8, 2011 EPI Briefing Paper #298

Economic Policy Institute

http://www.epi.org / direct URL: http://tinyurl.com/3mfsf82

Patrick L. Mason and Algernon Austin

The popular discussion of black immigrants often exaggerates their achievements and denigrates U.S.-born blacks. One regularly hears asked, "Why do black immigrants do better than native blacks?" (Coates 2009). In these discussions, black immigrants usually are presented as hard working, valuing education, entrepreneurial, and familyoriented. U.S.-born blacks are often presented as lacking all of these characteristics, and sometimes even described as carrying "victimhood baggage" (Coates 2009; Marshall 2006). Many such discussions are driven by anecdotes, and even when these issues are explored using actual data, rarely are comparisons based on more than one measure; rarer still is there a comparison of how black immigrants fare in comparison with native whites.

This report aims to deepen the public discussion by conducting a broader, more careful examination of the socio-economic standing of black immigrants relative to U.S.-born blacks and whites. Its main findings are:

  • After taking into account the effect of 15 wage-related characteristics, all black male populations are found to earn less than similar U.S.-born non-Hispanic white men. U.S.-born black men earn 19.1% less. West Indian men, that is, black immigrants from English-speaking Caribbean countries, do slightly worse, earning 20.7% less. Haitian men and African men do substantially worse than U.S.-born black men. Haitian men earn 33.8% less, and African men earn 34.7% less than similar native white men.
  • All groups of black women have lower weekly wages than similar U.S.-born non-Hispanic white women, but the size of the wage gaps is smaller for women than it is for men. West Indian women do somewhat better than U.S.-born black women. West Indian women earn 8.3% less than U.S.-born white women. U.S.-born black women earn 10.1% less than U.S.-born white women. African women also earn 10.1% less. Haitian women are the worst off, earning 18.6% less.
  • Analyses of unemployment and poverty rates show that U.S.-born and foreign-born black populations are also worse off than U.S.-born whites on these measures.
  • Economically, U.S.-born and foreign-born blacks have common problems that need to be addressed.

A broader look at the socioeconomic conditions of black immigrants

This report first examines the population growth and geographic distribution of the foreign-born black population, and then compares the U.S.- and foreign-born groups by educational attainment, marriage rates, unemployment rates, and poverty rates.

These comparisons are followed by a more sophisticated analysis of the groups' weekly wages. Multivariate statistical analyses are used to compare the groups while taking into account 15 additional characteristics (see the appendix for all variables). These characteristics are all useful in predicting weekly wages and could explain differences in the weekly wages among groups. The reference group for these analyses will be U.S.-born non-Hispanic whites.

U.S.-born blacks typically are found to earn less than U.S.-born whites in these types of analyses.

Population growth and concentrations

The black immigrant population has grown significantly over recent decades. In 2008, immigrants who identified as black alone or black in combination with some other race totaled 3.2 million and made up 8.1% of black America see Table 1). The number of foreign-born people who identify as black alone or black in combination increased by approximately 800,000 from 2000 to 2008 (see Table 2).

As with the immigrant population generally (Dockterman and Velasco 2010), the black immigrant population is growing at a faster rate than the U.S.-born black population. From 2000 to 2008, the foreign-born black-alone-or-incombination population increased 33.1%, but the U.S.-born black-aloneor -in-combination population increased 9.6% (see Table 2). The difference in the growth rates is even larger for the black-alone population.

The black foreign-born population is highly concentrated in a few states. More than one-in-four (27.4%) black immigrants live in New York state (see Figure A). Nearly one-in-five (17.8%) live in Florida. More than half (51.2%) of the black foreign-born population reside in just three states--New York, Florida, and New Jersey.

This high concentration of black immigrants in these states means that when individuals interact with blacks in these states they are often interacting with immigrants. While for the nation as a whole 8.1% of blacks are immigrants, in New York state 26.9% of blacks are immigrants. In Florida, 19.3% of blacks are immigrants, and in New Jersey, 15.5% (see Table 3). Within particular cities in these states the proportion of immigrants is likely even higher.

One does not have to live in a state with a large share of the total black immigrant population to feel the impact of black immigrants. In some states that have relatively few blacks, immigrants nonetheless make up a large share of the small black population. Nearly one-in-three blacks in Massachusetts are foreign-born. In North Dakota, Rhode Island, Maine, Vermont, and Minnesota, approximately onein -four blacks are foreign-born. Although there are small numbers of blacks in these states, a large share of the blacks are foreign-born.

Table 3

Share of foreign-born blacks in black population by state, 2008

Note: "Black" refers to the black-alone-or-in-combination population and includes Hispanics.

Source: Authors' analysis of American Community Survey data.

State                Percent of blacks who are foreign-born

Alabama                          0.6
Alaska                           8.7
Arizona                          8.0
Arkansas                         0.6
California                       6.1
Colorado                         9.8
Connecticut                     17.8
Delaware                         7.5
DC  				 7.0
Florida                         19.3
Georgia                          5.0
Hawaii                           8.4
Idaho                           16.8
Illinois                         2.7
Indiana                          2.3
Iowa                             7.6
Kansas                           4.5
Kentucky                         2.0
Louisiana                        0.6
Maine                           25.0
Maryland                        10.0
Massachusetts                   31.8
Michigan                         1.6
Minnesota                       23.7
Mississippi                      0.2
Missouri                         2.4
Montana                          6.9
Nebraska                        13.1
Nevada                           7.0
New Hampshire                   15.2
New Jersey                      15.5
New Mexico                       6.3
New York                        26.9
North Carolina	       		 2.4
North Dakota                    27.0
Ohio                             3.2
Oklahoma                         2.6
Oregon                           7.6
Pennsylvania                     4.9
Rhode Island                    26.2
South Carolina                   1.0
South Dakota                    14.7
Tennessee                        2.4
Texas                            5.0
Utah                            21.4
Vermont                         23.7
Virginia                         5.4
Washington                      13.7
West Virginia                    2.4
Wisconsin                        2.8
Wyoming                          4.7

Comparing selected black populations and U.S.-born whites

The analysis below focuses on the U.S.-born, the Englishspeaking Caribbean or West Indian,1 Haitian, and African black populations. Black refers inclusively to individuals who only identify as black and to individuals with biracial or multiracial black identities. The black populations will be compared to each other and to U.S.-born non-Hispanic whites. We start by comparing the groups by educational attainment, marriage rates, unemployment rates, and poverty rates.

Educational attainment

In the 25-years-and-older population, African immigrants had the highest attainment rate for bachelor's or higher degrees. More than one-third (36.6%) of African immigrants have a bachelor's or higher degree (see Table 4). U.S.- born non-Hispanic whites attained these degrees at 29.5%. About one-in-five (20.6%) of West Indians have college degrees. U.S.-born blacks and Haitian immigrants have basically equivalent rates of attaining college degrees, 16.4% and 16.1%, respectively.

While African immigrants have the highest rate of bachelor's or higher degrees, they do not have the lowest rate of high school dropouts. Only 9.8% of U.S.-born whites failed to obtain a high school diploma, but the rate is 12.9% for African immigrants. Haitians have the lowest rate of high school graduation, with 26.2% failing to obtain a high school diploma. U.S.-born blacks and West Indians have equivalent rates of dropping out of high school; 19.1% and 19.3%, respectively.

African immigrants obtain college and advanced degrees at greater rates than U.S.-born whites, but they fail to complete high school at higher rates than whites. In educational attainment, the West Indian population is slightly better off than the U.S.-born black population. The Haitian population is slightly worse off. Relative to the U.S.-born white and black populations, the black immigrant population has both positive and negative educational characteristics.

...

Unemployment rates

U.S.-born blacks have the highest unemployment rate (see Figure C). In 2008, their annual unemployment rate based on the American Community Survey was 12.3%. While foreign-born blacks had lower unemployment rates, their rates were all significantly higher than the white rate of 5.3%. The unemployment rate for West Indians and Africans were both 7.9%, or 1.5 times that of the white rate. The rate for Haitians was even higher--9.4%, or 1.8 times the white rate. While black immigrants have lower unemployment rates than U.S.-born blacks, they still have substantially high unemployment rates.

Poverty rates

U.S.-born blacks also have the highest poverty rate, at 24.5% (see Figure D). U.S.-born whites have the lowest poverty rate, at 9.2%. The poverty rates for black immigrants increases from West Indians (11.6%) to Haitians (15.7%) to Africans (18.8%). The African poverty rate is closer to the U.S.-born black rate than the U.S.-born white rate.

When comparing groups by educational attainment, marriage rates, unemployment rates, and poverty rates, a clear pattern of black disadvantage relative to U.S.-born whites begins to emerge. Specifically, on the economic measures of unemployment and poverty rates, all of the black immigrant groups do significantly worse than U.S.-born whites. This point provides some context for understanding the findings from the multivariate wage analysis below.

Comparing the wages of selected black populations to U.S.- born whites

When one puts aside the popular stereotypes that black immigrants fare better in the economy, one finds reasons why black immigrants might earn less than similar U.S.-born whites and blacks. As immigrants, they may lack a facility with American English and American accents--even if English is their first language. Many black immigrants, especially Africans, are highly educated, but if that education is from outside the United States, it may not be as valued as a U.S. degree. If foreign degrees are devalued in the U.S. labor market, then black immigrants may earn lower wages.

To assess the wages of black immigrants relative to U.S.born whites and blacks, we use a pooled dataset of the March Current Population Survey from 2001 to 2007. Wage data are inflation-adjusted to 2007 dollars using the Consumer Price Index - All Urban Consumers. We control for, or take into account the effect of, potential work experience, years of education, union status, region, marital status, number of unmarried children, service in the armed forces, unearned income, state employment-topopulation ratio, work limitations, and size of locality (see the appendix for a complete list of all variables in the regression analysis). In other words, the final results allow us to make "apples-to-apples" wage comparisons among workers of different races and nativity. The analysis is done separately for men and for women, and it is restricted to 16-64-year-olds.

Men

Contrary to the popular impression, black male immigrants are not better off in weekly wages than U.S.-born black males after controlling for observable demographic characteristics. Some black male immigrant groups are actually worse off than U.S.-born blacks (see Figure E). As expected, U.S.-born black men have weekly wages that are lower than similar U.S.-born non-Hispanic white men. U.S.- born black men earn 19.1% less than similar U.S.-born white men. West Indian men do slightly worse and earn 20.7% less than similar native white men. Haitian men and African men do substantially worse than U.S.-born black men; Haitian men earn 33.8% less, and African men earn 34.7% less than similar native white men. (All findings are statistically significant at the p<.001 level.)

Women

As with men, all groups of black women have lower weekly wages than similar U.S.-born non-Hispanic white women, but the size of the wage disparity is smaller (see Figure E). West Indian women do somewhat better than U.S.-born black women. West Indian women earn 8.3% less than U.S.-born white women. U.S.-born black women earn 10.1% less than U.S.-born white women. African women also earn 10.1% less. Haitian women are the worst off, earning 18.6% less. While U.S.-born black women are not in the best position among the groups of black women, it would be incorrect to make the blanket claim that black female immigrants do better wage-wise than U.S.-born black women. (All findings are statistically significant at the p<.001 level.)

In regards to weekly wages, overall, U.S.-born non-Hispanic whites earn significantly more than similar blacks regardless of nativity. On this measure, foreign-born blacks do not outperform U.S.-born blacks. Some may be surprised by this finding in light of the higher poverty rates among U.S.-born blacks. But poverty rates are the result of several factors. The higher unemployment rates and lower marriage rates of U.S.-born blacks are likely contributing factors to their higher poverty rates.

Conclusion

When one compares the socioeconomic standing of black immigrants with U.S.-born blacks and whites, the strongest finding is that of the U.S.-born white advantage relative to all black groups. Africans have a high rate of obtaining college degrees, but they also have a relatively high rate of not having a high school degree. U.S.-born whites have the lowest rate of high school dropouts. U.S.-born whites have the highest marriage rates, the lowest unemployment rates, and the lowest poverty rates. Even after taking into account the effect of 14 wage-related characteristics, U.S.-born whites have significantly higher wages than all black groups.

Contrary to the popular stereotype, black immigrants are not consistently better off than U.S.-born blacks. In educational attainment and weekly wages, U.S.-born blacks fall within the range of black immigrant groups. U.S.-born blacks are worse off in marriage rates, unemployment rates, and poverty rates. However, foreign-born blacks cannot be said to be doing well, even if they are not quite as bad off as U.S.-born blacks. Economically, U.S.-born and foreign-born blacks have common problems that need to be addressed.

The fact that black immigrant groups--who are said to be hardworking, valuing education, entrepreneurial, and family-oriented--do relatively poorly in finding work, obtaining a good wage, and staying out of poverty suggests that the playing field is not as level as popularly believed. The fact that all of these groups are black may contribute to their hardships in the United States.


AfricaFocus Bulletin is an independent electronic publication providing reposted commentary and analysis on African issues, with a particular focus on U.S. and international policies. AfricaFocus Bulletin is edited by William Minter.

AfricaFocus Bulletin can be reached at africafocus@igc.org. Please write to this address to subscribe or unsubscribe to the bulletin, or to suggest material for inclusion. For more information about reposted material, please contact directly the original source mentioned. For a full archive and other resources, see http://www.africafocus.org


Read more on |Africa Economy & Development|

URL for this file: http://www.africafocus.org/docs11/mig1108b.php